Trusted by teams worldwide
Why choose Twingate over Netbird?
Twingate
Ephemeral, per-connection SSH certificates from a local or Vault-backed CA. No keys on devices.
Govern inbound path to your infrastructure: k8s, SSH, databases, web apps, with session recording and per-resource scoping
Layer 7 gateway forwards user identity into cluster RBAC; every command audited and replayable.
Managed control plane. Nothing to host, patch or page an engineer about.
Connector + Controller, gateway-based segmentation.
Invisible to end users with seamless, always-on connectivity
NetBird and Twingate solve the first half of the same problem the same way: get an authorised user to a private resource without exposing it to the internet. Both do that well.
They diverge on the second half. A mesh's job ends when the connection is established. Twingate's begins there — brokering a short-lived certificate, forwarding your identity into the cluster's own RBAC, recording the session to your infrastructure, and cutting access the moment you revoke the user.
If your access layer only needs to answer can this person reach this host, a mesh is a reasonable answer. If it needs to answer what did they do once they got there, it isn't.
Identity-based access for users, services, and AI agents that deploys in minutes, scales to every resource, and finally lets you retire your VPN.
